Democrat calls Gov. Murphy ‘Grinch’ over veto of Christmas tree bonfires bill
Clinton used to hold an annual Christmas tree bonfire, before the Murphy administration barred such events. (Courtesy of Clinton)
Gov. Phil Murphy this week rejected a bipartisan bill that would have allowed for community Christmas tree bonfires, prompting one Democratic lawmaker to compare Murphy to the Grinch.
Murphy in a statement accompanying his Monday veto of the bill said that while he appreciates how holiday bonfires bring people together, attract tourists, and raise money for charity, burning trees ultimately harms vulnerable residents’ health and increases pollution. The measure passed the Legislature unanimously in June.
“There are many ways to celebrate the winter season, and I am confident that New Jersey’s vibrant and resourceful communities will find meaningful new traditions to bring people together without the harmful public health and environmental effects of open-air tree burning,” he said in the statement.
Sen. Andrew Zwicker (D-Middlesex), a prime sponsor of the bill, said the measure was inspired by an annual Christmas tree bonfire formerly hosted by Clinton, a town in Hunterdon County. Murphy’s fight against Christmas tree burnings is “such a Grinch thing to do in the scheme of things,” Zwicker said.
“This is such a tiny little thing. And the claim that it is somehow about public health is just so silly,” said Zwicker, a physicist and science educator.
Christmas tree burnings had previously been allowed under a 2017 administrative order from the Department of Environmental Protection if towns obtained the right permits, but the Murphy administration later barred them, citing safety reasons, negative health impacts, and toxic air pollution. The department encourages municipalities to dispose of trees in an environmentally friendly way, like mulching.
Zwicker said he and the bill’s co-sponsors called U.S. Sen. Cory Booker’s office to see if Christmas tree burnings violate the federal Clean Air Act, and they were told they would not be a violation.
The burning of green plant matter releases air pollutants linked to adverse health effects, largely for people with heart, lung, and respiratory issues, Murphy said in his veto statement. This pollution also harms the environment and contributes to climate change, he said.
Zwicker agreed that the particulate matter created by burning Christmas trees is “real.” Still, he said he doesn’t see why it’s significantly worse than Clinton’s current practice of burning chemically treated wooden pallets instead of trees.
“It’s a small bill, but it was an important community-building bill at a time when we are struggling in a post-COVID world to build community,” Zwicker said. “We’re talking about a couple of dozen Christmas trees for a couple of hours. From a scientific perspective or from a community perspective, none of it makes any sense at all.”
An earlier version of this story should have said Zwicker’s inspiration for the bill was an annual bonfire in the Town of Clinton, not Clinton Township.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.